BUILD PROCESS
How We Work

You have decided to build. What comes next?

The first conversation settles direction and scope. Once the project is worth pursuing, we work with you to organize the data relationships, define the core usage paths, run a platform trial and make clear how updates and maintenance will be handled after launch.

How it usually goes

A project usually goes through four stages

A smaller project can take a lighter path, while a complex one spends more time on data design and the trial run. How far each step goes is set by the scope both sides confirm.

  • 01
    Direction and boundary assessment

    First assess whether the existing data is worth turning into a resource and which form fits better: internal use, shared collaboration, public release, a paper-linked resource or an upgrade of an existing platform. This clarifies the research question, the intended users, data ownership and what is left out of scope for now.

    Deliverable a direction assessment and a scope note
  • 02
    Data and resource design

    Organize samples, projects, analysis results, paper figures and supplementary tables around the confirmed research tasks, and design the fields, data relationships, evidence sources, versioning rules and access boundaries.

    Deliverable a data asset inventory, fields and resource structure
  • 03
    Platform development and trial run

    Develop search, browsing, visualization, download and permission features for the confirmed use cases, then run a trial with core samples, genes, figures and typical usage paths.

    Deliverable a trial-ready version and acceptance records
  • 04
    Launch, handover and maintenance

    Confirm the launch scope, citation and download notes, permissions and responsible owners, and produce a version that can be handed over. Later updates, intake of new projects and operational support are provided only within the agreed project handover scope.

    Deliverable a live resource, handover documentation and maintenance boundaries
How both sides work together

At each stage, who prepares what

The scientific content needs the research group's confirmation, while data curation, platform development and testing are carried out by GeneSight within the agreed scope. At the end of each stage, both sides can see a concrete result.

Direction and boundary assessment
What your team prepares
Research direction, existing data types, primary users, openness goals and current platform problems
What GeneSight handles
Sort out the research tasks, team capacity and the support that needs to be added, then assess the resource form, the development boundary and whether the next step is worth taking
Deliverable
a direction assessment and a scope note
Data and resource design
What your team prepares
Sample and project lists, data file locations, the paper and supplementary materials, terminology and permission requirements
What GeneSight handles
Complete the data inventory, identifiers and field design, and build traceable links between data and evidence
Deliverable
a data asset inventory, fields and resource structure
Platform development and trial run
What your team prepares
Confirm the core content, typical usage paths and acceptance rules, and review the scientific content and display boundaries promptly
What GeneSight handles
Complete data ingestion, page and feature development, testing and fixes, making sure every entry point maps to a clear data source
Deliverable
a trial-ready version and acceptance records
Launch, handover and maintenance
What your team prepares
Confirm the launch content, open license, update cadence and who is responsible afterward
What GeneSight handles
Complete the launch and handover, the version notes and maintenance support within the agreed scope; new data, features or deployment needs are confirmed separately
Deliverable
a live resource, handover documentation and maintenance boundaries

The three problems most likely to slow a project down

Broken sample links

Sample names, groups, batches and processing information are inconsistent, making the data hard to search and reuse later.

Broken analysis links

Expression matrices, differential analysis, enrichment results and figure sources cannot be mapped to one another, which makes it harder to recheck the paper or hand the work to a new member.

Broken version links

Data updates, field changes and figure exports go unrecorded, which tends to cause confusion during long-term maintenance.

Frequently asked questions

No. The initial assessment only needs to know the research direction, the data types, the current state of the data and the usage goals; uploading raw sequencing data is not required. Whether raw files are brought in later can be decided based on the development scope and permission boundaries.

Not sure how the project should start?

The first conversation does not need a complete plan. Describe the research subject, the data you already have and the current difficulty, and we will first assess whether the project is worth pursuing and which step is the better place to start.